MICHAEL DOWD: What’s Real? What’s Important?—Evidence as Divine Guidance
I wrote the following while preparing for my conversation with Connie (background on me, here. If you missed the interview or wish to listen again, click here and scroll to the bottom. The password is “emerge”).
The following represents my thinking — but given the diversity of speakers in this series, it will be no less unique than that of any of the others.
To my mind, the health and wellbeing of families, nations, and our world in the 21st century will be enormously impacted by how religious individuals and institutions think about concepts such as “divine communication,” “divine guidance,” and even “God’s word.” I offer the following in the hopes of stimulating heartful reflection, discussion, and debate. I welcome radically honest feedback in the comments section.
The most profound insight in the history of humankind is that we should seek to live in accord with reality. Indeed, living in harmony with reality may be accepted as a formal definition of wisdom. If we live at odds with reality (foolishly), then we will be doomed, but if live in proper relationship with reality (wisely), then we shall be saved. Humans everywhere, and at all times, have had at least a tacit understanding of this fundamental principle. What we are less in agreement about is how we should think about reality and what we should do to bring ourselves into harmony with it.
As humanity’s collective intelligence embodied in the new academic discipline of big history shows, the Universe began 13.7 billion years ago and, at least with respect to its upper limit, has engaged in a creative process of increasing complexity ever since: from galaxies of stars that created atoms, to oceans of molecules that brought forth the first living cell, to ecosystems of interactions that created minds, to swirling societies of minds that created culture, technology, and probing subjectivity.
The major transitions in physical, biological, and human evolution can be seen as transformations in how information regarding what’s real and what’s important is stored and shared in increasingly complex and efficient ways. These two questions: “What’s real?” and “What’s important?” — or in the words of philosopher of evolution Loyal Rue, “how things are” and “which things matter” — are the fundamental ones that not only all cultures but all life-forms have concerned themselves with. It’s easy to see why. Without an accurate sense of the nature of reality and how live in right relationship to reality, you or your culture, no less than amoebas, wouldn’t survive. Extinction, after all, is the norm.
All religions are mythic maps of reality. Specifically, they are maps of what’s real and what’s important that facilitate individual and social wellbeing. There’s not a religion anywhere in the world that isn’t a map of how things are and which things matter, which, when followed, has traditionally led to personal wholeness and social coherence. If you don’t get this, you don’t get religion.
So how have human beings stored and shared information about these two vital questions during our quarter million year history as Homo sapiens? And how have we done so in ways that simultaneously aligned individual and group self-interest? Only by learning and honoring how this process occurred in the past might we navigate today’s challenges with the wisdom commensurate with the full experience of our ancestry. And that wisdom is much deeper and wider than the biblical writers could possibly have accessed.
Many thinkers and writers have chronicled the profound shifts in consciousness and culture catalyzed by how information has been stored and shared in increasingly efficient and accurate ways over the millennia, from orality to literacy to mathematics to science to electronics to computers, and now the internet. Most notable among those who have helped us understand the significance this process are Jesuit historian and philosopher Walter J. Ong, media ecologist Robert K. Logan, and evolutionist John Stewart. Here I will focus primarily on oral and written modes of guidance essential for the wellbeing of individuals and societies.
Divine Guidance for 98% of Human History
Prior to verbal, symbolic language — that is, prior to words — information regarding the nature of reality and how to live in accord with it was stored and shared genetically and through cultural practices communicated by sounds, gestures, and behaviors.
Even when we began communicating in words, much vital information re how to survive and reproduce was still stored and shared genetically, as the recent fields of evolutionary psychology and evolutionary brain science illuminate. Getting hungry and horny happens naturally. No thinking necessary. We instinctually know how to handle the basics of safety, sustenance, and sex. We also instinctually have feelings that lead us to cooperate with kin and those who will return the favor. But beyond this, virtually everything important to know about how to thrive, given the unique constraints and opportunities afforded by any particular bioregion or cultural context, would have been stored in the minds of elders and shared via stories and rituals. These stories would naturally have reflected both our daytime and nighttime experience. Sacred tales of animals talking, gods and goddesses blessing, or of demons tempting are no more supernatural than what we do in our dreams is supernatural.
As anthropologist Benson Saler showed in the 1970s, the very notion of supernatural — in opposition to natural — is a Western invention. Only when scientific understandings of “the natural” began emerging was it deemed necessary by some to speak of “the supernatural”: that which was imagined to be above or outside of nature.
But flying in our dreams (no matter how real it may feel in the moment) really isn’t super-natural; it’s just what reality is like in the dream state. Ancient stories of miraculous deeds, superhuman feats, and otherworldly agents and events aren’t supernatural either. They are pre-natural. Such explanations came into being long before natural, factual understandings were even possible. (Imagine living 500 years ago and, without using supernatural-sounding language, trying to explain epilepsy, serious infection, how the Himalayas came into existence, or how the sun moves across the sky. Good luck!) As I wrote in the preface of Thank God for Evolution:
How was the world made? Why do earthquakes, tornados, and other bad things happen? Why must we die? And why do different peoples answer these questions in different ways? The big questions that children have always asked and will continue to ask cannot be answered by the powers of human perception alone. Ancient cultures gave so-called supernatural answers to these questions, but those answers were not truly supernatural—they were pre-natural. Prior to advances in technology and scientific ways of testing truth claims, factual answers were simply unavailable. It was not just difficult to understand infection before microscopes brought bacteria into focus; it was impossible. Without an evolutionary worldview, it is similarly impossible to understand ourselves, our world, and what is required for humanity to survive. For religious leaders today to rely on pre-natural answers puts them at odds not only with science but with one another — dangerously so. Their resistance, however, does make sense. Until scientific discoveries are fleshed into the life-giving forms of beauty and goodness (as well as truth and utility), scriptural literalism will command power and influence.
“Scripture” That Doesn’t Evolve Can Become Deadly
“A mistake in our understanding of Creation will result in a mistake in our understanding of God.” —St. Thomas Aquinas
When writing first developed (only during the last 5,000 years — 2% of our existence as humans), it was first used to record debts and agreements and only later to communicate information regarding how things are and which things matter.
There are two essential things to remember about storing and sharing information re what’s real and what’s important via the written word…
First, is the fact that all ancient understandings of the nature of reality and how to live in right relationship to it were passed on orally, from teller to listener to teller to listener long before they were committed to writing. More, they were always being tweaked and embellished along the way — simply because that’s the way our brains work. It’s impossible not to do this. The children’s game of telephone powerfully illustrates this point.
Even in what we Christians refer to as the “New Testament,” meaning-filled stories of Jesus life, teachings, death, and resurrection, as well as stories of the birth and development of the early church, were tweaked and embellished and passed on orally for decades before being written down. The early church leaders in the 2nd and 3rd centuries sought to alleviate concerns about the accuracy of these stories by invoking the Holy Spirit as ensuring faithful transmission. But it makes a world of difference whether one has an unnatural or natural understanding of this process. Originally, the phrase “Holy Spirit” pointed to “sacred wind” and “breath of God” — not a supernatural spook or otherworldly being that miraculously made sure nothing normal and natural took place.
The second vital thing to remember about the advent of literacy is the sobering fact that, when any culture becomes overly enamored of the magical powers of scratches on parchment, for the very first time in life’s several billion-year process of sharing information from one generation to the next, such information will mightily resist being modified and adapted to changing conditions and improved understandings. As I wrote in Chapter 1 of TGFE:
Imagine parents, grandparents, and respected elders telling stories to the young about who they are, where they came from, why they are here, what really matters, and how to lead honorable, fulfilled lives. Orally transmitted stories would evolve over time as conditions changed and as generations faced new challenges. Yes, these stories would evolve — until (and if!) they were written down and declared to be the unchanging revelation of God. When a story becomes scripture, it ceases to evolve.
Transforming how we individually and collectively think about “scripture”, “divine guidance”, and “God’s word” may be the single most important thing that religious institutions can concern themselves with in the coming decades. Why? Because widespread failure to honor evidence as divine guidance exacts a severe toll on individuals, families, and our world.
By thinking of revelation as fossilized in ancient texts, we inevitably…
- trivialize God and gospel;
- balkanize religion and bastardize science;
- desacralize nature;
- blaspheme death;
- fail our children and grandchildren;
- deny individuals and families access to the most important saving wisdom for overcoming personal and interpersonal challenges; and
- blind ourselves from seeing our way out of the global integrity crisis.
In contrast, embracing scientific, historical, and cross-cultural evidence as divine guidance…
- REALizes God and gospel;
- reconciles science and religion;
- resacralizes nature;
- drastically shifts how we see death;
- inspires our children and grandchildren;
- gives individuals and families access to the most important saving wisdom for overcoming personal and interpersonal challenges; and
- offers a clear and realistically hopeful path forward, individually and collectively.
I’ll say more about what I mean by all this (taking one pair at a time and providing examples) in future blog posts. But please remember: this represents my point of view. Some of the other thought leaders involved in this series would surely see and say things differently.
ALSO SEE:
• Is Scientific Evidence Modern-Day Scripture?
• The Evidential Reformation: Humanity Comes of Age
• Day & Night Language and Public & Private Revelation
Here is the interview that the above was written to support (password=”emerge”).
Resources Connie and I discussed, and some we didn’t but should have…
Thank God for Evolution: How the Marriage of Science and Religion Will Transform Your Life and Our World – my book, which was endorsed by 6 Nobel Prize-winning scientists and other science luminaries, including noted skeptics, and by religious leaders across the spectrum
Stories of Awakening – testimonials
Why Evangelize Evolution? – blogpost
Evolution Isn’t About Darwin—It’s About Salvation Before You Die – blogpost
The Salvation of Religion: From Beliefs to Knowledge – blogpost
Religious Naturalism – website
Religious Naturalism – wikipedia page
Biblical Christianity Is Bankrupt (PDF version here) – My public debate with Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, over what I see as the radical difference between evolutionary faith and literalist faith. (The NY Times iNewp service: “The People’s Press” picked up on it and ran it as a series. Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
Evidence as Divine Communication and Divine Guidance
All Truth Is God’s Truth – Arthur F. Holmes
Good and Bad Reasons for Believing – by Richard Dawkins
One-Story Universe / REALizing of Myth and Religious Language
God Is a Divine Personification, Not a Person – blogpost
“What Reality in Human Experience Do We Point to with the Word, ‘God’?”, pdf of a short essay by evolutionary theologian, Gene Marshall. I consider this chapter from one of Gene’s books as foundational to an evolutionary understanding of the divine. (The pdf shows up sideways, so you’ll need to open it with Adobe Reader and, under the “View” menu, rotate it clockwise. Otherwise you’ll need to print it out. It’s only 10 pages and well worth it!)
Evolutionary Spirituality: Coming Home to Reality – blogpost
Religion Is About Right Relationship to Reality, Not the Supernatural – blogpost
Expanded Sense of Self and Relatedness / Big History as Our Creation Story
The Universe Is a Green Dragon - Brian Swimme (Everyone over the age of 12 should read this book!)
What Is the Great Story? – website portal (lots of great stuff here!)
Everybody’s Story: Wising Up to the Epic of Evolution – Loyal Rue
Evolution and the Revival of the Human Spirit – secular sermon
Big History – my blogpost about Teaching Company Course by David Christian. (The single best educational experience of my entire life. Bill Gates agrees!)
This Fleeting World: A Short History of Humanity – by David Christian (Everyone over the age of 12 should read this book!)
Death Is No Less Sacred Than Life
Death Through Deep-Time Eyes – online resources
Tree Talks About Death – kids story written by Connie Barlow
“The Gifts of Death“ - litany/responsive reading
“Yes to the Universe” – litany/responsive reading
Promises of Religion In This Life Depend on Getting “Mismatched Instincts in a World of Supernormal Stimuli”
Evolutionize Your Life: Heaven Is Coming Home to Reality – video presentation
“One-on-one with Michael Dowd” – NH Public Television documentary on my “Evolutionize Your Life” program (above)
Mismatched Instincts in a World of Supernormal Stimuli – online resources (TheGreatStory.org) re Evolutionary Psychology and Evolutionary Brain Science (especially see Part 1, the first 30 minutes, of this.)
Podcasts
Evolutionary Christianity – Dowd interviews 37 Christian thought leaders and top scientists
America’s Evolutionary Evangelists – Dowd and Barlow riff on various topics
Inspiring Naturalism - Barlow and Dowd interview leading scientists
Evolving Faith – Dowd interviews ministers and theologians

Michael Dowd
Response to “What is Real? What is Important?”: Why I Think All Serious Seekers and Thinkers in This Series Should Consider Learning Something About the Bahá’í Faith
I listened to Michael and Connie tonight. Thank you, Connie, for posing some of the questions I, and others had for Michael. I read Michael’s book over a year and a half ago and I was blown away by it. I am a member of the Bahá’í Faith, and a former Catholic. As I read Thank God for Evolution I took notes in the margins. I found myself writing “Bahá’í concept” over and over again. And when I spoke with Michael almost a year ago he told me that other Bahá’ís have also told him that many of the things he says sound like Bahá’í concepts (though it is clear to me that there are some very fundamental differences). One of Michael’s main points and one made by many speakers in this series, which is that religions MUST take science seriously and learn not just to reconcile it with faith, but embrace it, is a CORE CONCEPT of the Bahá’í Faith. Further, the Bahá’í Faith takes the position that many of the events in the Bible have symbolic meaning or are metaphorical, versus literal. Here are a few Bahá’í writings on science and religion: “The virtues of humanity are many, but science is the most notable of them all.” “Science is the first emanation from God toward man.” “God has endowed man with intelligence and reason whereby he is required to determine the verity of questions and propositions.” “If religious beliefs and opinions are found to be contrary to the standards of science, they are mere superstitions and imaginations; for the antithesis of knowledge is ignorance, and the child of ignorance is superstition.”
Bahá’í writings are abound on the idea of evolutionary processes that involve an unfolding of simpler forms into more complex forms, of an increase in complexity over long expanses of time. Writings from one of the central Bahá’í figures states specifically that “Moses taught that the world was brought into existence in the six days of creation. This is an allegory, a symbolic form of the ancient truth that the world evolved gradually..We thus have a progressive process of creation, and not a one-time happening. Moses’ days of creation represent time spans of millions of years.”
What Bahá’ís accept as reality is progressive revelation, that the religion of God is, in fact one. In other words, all of the world’s major religions like Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam and the Bahá’í Faith are the progressive unfolding of God’s spiritual truths, revealed to mankind at the times when people needed it, and delivered in a way that was appropriate to the capacity of the people at the time. The spiritual messages are essentially the same while the cultural message had to pertain to the people were and where they were in their state of intellectual and social evolution at the time. And just as we get a new school teacher when we go from one grade to the next, and the material gets more and more complicated and complex as our brains gain more capacity to understand, God sends new teachers to us (whom we call Manifestations) to renew the spiritual message and bring the next bits of knowledge we need for an ever-advancing civilization. ( Bahá’ís recognize Jesus as one of those Manifestations and love and respect Him for bringing the Word of God and for His sacrifice for us all.) I think this is very much consistent, in many respects, to what Michael and others have said about how man did not have the ability to understand science in the past, but we have evolved to a place where we do know why there are earthquakes and lights in the sky. Even the scientific method itself has evolved, as Michael showed in the part of his book that mentions the Wired article on this topic. As our scientific knowledge evolves, religion does, too. Or at least that is what the Bahá’í Faith says. This is what makes sense to me. And it respects all people and the earth and science and evolution. No hocus pocus involved.
So I would simply offer to those Christians listening in and even speaking here, or others out there who do feel there is a living God, not just a Reality, that Michael asserts ( I mean no disrespect – I just beg to differ), and that God’s spiritual Revelation does take the form of literal text like the Bible, that Jesus Christ (and perhaps other Manifestations of God) revealed authoritative Words that should guide our lives and behaviors, that there is something for us after we die (Bahá’ís do not believe in fiery Hell and streets of Gold heaven), AND that science is another way that God reveals truth to us, that superstition and dogma must be thrown out, and “flat-earth faith” must be replaced by sound science and we should have respect and gratitude for our challenges as products of an awesome evolutionary heritage, I encourage you to learn something about the Bahá’í Faith.
Final thoughts: I think that Michael is ignoring the spirit, the soul, the spiritual essence that is man. And this is a key element of the faiths that I am aware of. It seems to me that he, like some other speakers in this series, were once Christians who were taught a literal and wholly unsatisfying and irrational version of Christianity. They tried to make it work only to find it didn’t fit. It wasn’t right. In fact, it was dangerous. Then they found out about the evidence of God manifested by science. They got it! They figured out what we scientists (many of us, anyway) have known all along. Nature’s processes are profound! They are beautiful and intricate and worthy of respect. Yet they had the insight to take the next step and see how this harmonized with faith. They embraced it wholeheartedly and found a way to make it harmonize with faith in a real, meaningful and healing way. I honor this and respect it so much. As a former Christian who also struggled with what I was taught, I thank you for the tremendous service you are providing to those young people who feel trapped or lost. I would just challenge those who understand and respect the reality that is the progressive unfolding of the material world by the process of evolution, to consider that this may, in fact, be the pattern of how God works – that religious truth, too, is a progressive unfolding for a humanity that is evolving intellectually and spiritually. These are just my thoughts and opinions. I offer them with respect for everyone’s views herein.
Thanks for sharing your perspective and your heart, Lisa!
For those wishing to learn more about the Bahá’í faith, see here:
Bahá’í Faith – wikipedia page
What is the Bahá’í Faith? – from the Bahá’í website
Thanks, Michael!
2/1/11
Dear Michael and Connie,
Thank you so much for this series, for the incredible effort, intelligence and warmth you brought to it. What a gift you’ve given by providing this amazing group of scholars and luminaries to us. Each presentation was amazing … and I haven’t caught up yet … so many different voices coming together in a new way.
So I am sorry to see it end but extremely grateful for the privilege of living in these times when the narrow confines of the past are breaking open.
With great gratitude,
Liz Sweeney, SSJ (another Catholic nun on the evolutionary path)
Lisa,
thank you for sharing
another beautiful understanding
of things
Thank you, Gabrielle. (I actually thought I responded to your comment earlier this morning, but clearly the post didn’t stick.) I have also enjoyed your poems and sayings throughout this series, such as the one posted after John Polkinghorne’s talk. Thank you for such interesting and inspiring wordcraft.
The final interview was just extraordinary, astonishing. I commend you so very highly for your sharing. I wish that what you had to say could be put to music, dance, poetry, children’s stories, and/or other kinds of stories. But, in fact, this has already happened many times over for many centuries and with more to come. One just has to look for the artistic offerings and to keep ones ears, eyes, & nose open for more.
In his book, The Evolution of the Idea of God, Jim Dollar says – and I am quoting from memory: “I am the Christ, the Son of the Living God; You are the Christ, the Son/Daughter of the Living God. I and the Father are One. If Jesus can say it, I can say it and so can you. This is what it means to take up our identities as followers of the way and to be in the way, on the way. Our challenge as followers of the Way is to be who we are and to become who we really are. This task is never ending this side of death; beyond death, who can say? But like the Creation itself – our story, our stories would seem to be unending in the task of our unfolding…our becoming.”
This seems to be very much akin to what you say in the final interview. It is at least similar from a different perspective.
I am benefitting so very highly from your perspectives.
For more on Jim Dollar, for future reference, go to —
http://www.jimdollarphotography.com
http://outlandspress.blogspot.com
Thank you Lisa for introducing me to Bahá’í.
It is my pleasure.
I went to Jim Dollar’s link that you provided. What beautiful photography! Reminds me of Peter Lik’s work.
On one page of Jim’s blog he wrote, “What we see is a reflection of who’s looking.” Isn’t that the truth?? Thanks for sharing. : )
I remember reading Loyal Rue’s Everybody’s Story and Religion Is Not About God. I was agnostic at the time, perhaps atheist as is he. I found his books so exhilarating, yet as time passed I found myself unmoved. For me (and I mean just me here) nature alone without personality, without values, is not enough (As John Haught writes in Is Nature Enough), nor is assigning all religious narrative to solely metaphor/symbolism. I prefer “layers of possible meanings” as Haught proposes. The effort to naturalize religion strikes me as emptying religion of its power and replacing it with nothing. Perhaps Unitarians qualify or more modern attempts to develop religious practice around everybody’s story? I often find these efforts rootless. I suppose it is difficult to “wise up to the epic of evolution” as Rue puts it outside of religious traditions and it is difficult to do so within them without faithfully engaging with them, but I do think the latter is occurring. I appreciate your series here where you are in dialogue with many different perspectives that do not neccessarily abandon the possible reality of stories about how things are or more importantly the derivations of which things matter from those stories. Ultimately, I am drawn to efforts to more deeply engage and wrestle with Christianity in light of all that we now know. I also think some of the analysis of premodern people is simplistic and we ought to ponder these ultimate things with a large measure of humility.
Thanks for the series and all the folks you brought in.
Korey, have you read my book? I highly recommend it, especially in light of your comment, above. You can download the preface, prologue, intro, and first two chapters here.
i am here
i listen
i breathe
The most advanced scientific/Christian process ( I say Christian because it is based on Love of neighbor and Self) is called Quantum Jumping. Burt Goldman Presents: The Inter-Dimensional Quest for a Better You. It is a practical approach to the Divine Idea of Quantum Physics. It is the fast-track to a renewing of the mind. All things become possible. It unites all things into a cohesive whole–beyond duality. There is no need to be concerned what man chooses in this Reality because it is based on vibratory attraction. We attract and receive on the level we resonate from. Love is the answer. There is no darkness in light and there is no light in darkness. We must choose whether to evolve through creative process or die through stagnation. Either way, we receive on the level we operate from. (we attract from the level we function on)
May the Lord we choose to honor give us the desires of our heart…
Thank you Michael and Connie for all your hard work in putting together these dialogues. Kudos to you Michael for your attentiveness and listening as you managed to make a wonderful program even better by including more lady luminaries. EveryBody needs a heart or right brain. Heart,right brain ,left brain these women have it all! Great recovery!!!
My take is we are all on the alpha-omega express and can’t get off. Some might argue a “milk train”. We do indeed have free will. We can resist(and suffer!). Or we can consent to His presence and enjoy the evolutionary journey and in doing so co-create a better world. Just need to get my false self (not so easy sometimes) out of the way. “Let go and let God” as they say in 12 step programs. I do need more than a naturalized God. I have found some comfort in Ken Wilber’s “One Two Three of God ” approach.
Connie and Michael,
What a well crafted end to a wonderful set of conversations. I found it summed up so much and clarified some points I wasn’t completely clear on.
I wrote a prose poem that weaves the important insights I received from these talks (so far!) and posted it on a blog I created recently to track my own understanding of topics in this large conversation. I won’t post it here, but if anyone is interested, I will put the link at the bottom of this post.
I look forward to listening to as many of the live seminars as I can and will be sad when the series comes to an end. A group I am involved with here will begin studying one of Brian Swimme’s DVD series in the next few weeks, and I feel this series has given me a real grounding in the ideas and memes related to the next stage of my spiritual journey.
I look forward to your next project and want to express my deepest gratitude for what you are doing for our species and our world.
Warmest regards,
Richard
Here is the link to my poem: http://stillinthestream.wordpress.com/2011/01/16/summary-of-38-conversations-from-the-advent-of-evolutionary-christianity/
Richard -
I just checked out your new blog — and I signed up for email notice. Your presence in the comments of this series have helped me appreciate the conversations even more, and to more fully articulate and bring to conscious awareness my own views. I just checked out the blog link of yours and posted a comment on it — about how I am so in sync with the way you framed the presence of evil in the world, much like Joseph Campbell but more fully. You are an extraordinarily poetic writer, as well as deep and generous thinker!
I’m looking forward to staying in communication via your blogpage well beyond this series.
Thanks Connie,
me too.
Richard
hello Richard
your poem is beautiful
theology to autobiography
blessings
Gabrielle
Thank you Gabrielle,
That means a lot coming from you. Your poems are such a blessing.
Richard
I have thoroughly enjoyed this series – and am delighted that each program brought new, refreshing, exciting points of view. There were no “diminishing returns” by listening to them all.
One viewpoint that I didn’t hear in the series is that represented by “New Thought” Christians such as Unity. Unity (and its cohorts such as Science of Mind/Religious Science) have advocated the harmony of science and spirituality for over 100 years, including favorable views of evolution as part of the Christian faith.
Unity’s co-founder Charles Fillmore, for example, wrote an article in the November 1925 issue of Unity Magazine titled “Involution and Evolution”. In it he presents the concept that a Divine Idea always proceeds manifestation – first the thought, then the expression. He goes on to say that the creation story in 1st chapter of Genesis sets the stage for the evolution of humankind described in Chapter 2 of Genesis (and continues in the rest of the Bible).
In Unity, we often say that the Bible is the story of the evolution of each person’s soul. The problem with the Bible is that a back cover was placed on it. Mr. Fillmore also wrote, in his latter years, a manuscript titled “The Story of Jesus’ Soul Evolution”. Unfortunately, he died before it was published. The title of the work suggests his dedication to the idea of evolution as a part of the Christian tradition.
Unity teachings tell us that God is Spirit and, since humankind is created in the image and likeness of God, our essential nature is also of Spirit. We are therefore Spiritual Beings having a human experience. Each of us have God presence as part of our nature, which we often name as “the Christ within”. One of my self-identifications as a Christian is that I am Christian because I believe deeply in the Christ within concept.
This orientation, from my experience, has liberated me to connect with the idea that I (and everyone else) is a part of all creation. To me, this is very similar to ideas which you expressed in your Five Moments of Grace discussion. The Christ within also calls me to participation in the co-creation of our evolving universe!
Another element that flows from this process is the understanding that “It Is All God and It Is All Good.” As I have realize the pervasiveness of the Presence, I can step beyond not only the actions resulting from my “mismatched instincts” but also beyond the inadequate or inappropriate thoughts that come into my still-emerging mind.
Then, as I pause, remembering It is Really All God, I call myself into a new perspective of any given experience or event. Usually this leaves me still hungering for a deeper understanding, but I know that more will and is being revealed!
The metaphysics of New Thought Christianity are, in a way, a short cut to many of the same observations that “Advent of Evolutionary Christianity” has honored us with. I share them in the Spirit of adding to the tapestry of Mythic Naturalism and the rich diversity of spiritual knowing it opens us to.
Blessings